Osteolysis in cemented versus cementless acetabular components.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 8648305.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
A prospective, randomized, double-blind, clinical trial comparing cemented with cementless total hip arthroplasty was performed to compare the prevalence and pattern of acetabular osteolysis. Both groups were similar before surgery. Acetabular components were metal-backed, titanium implants. Twenty-eight-millimeter modular femoral heads with titanium femoral stems were used. At a minimum 2-year and mean 4-year follow-up period (range, 2-6 years), 224 patients had clinical and radiographic data available. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of acetabular osteolysis between cemented (5%) and cementless (9%) fixation. With or without cement, the use of a titanium femoral head led to osteolysis within a relatively short period after surgery in almost all of the cases, although this was not significant. The pattern of acetabular osteolysis was different. Progressive osteolysis occurred predominantly in acetabular zone 1 in the cemented group and zone 2 in the cementless group. Cementless fixation of acetabular components has been advocated in an attempt to minimize osteolysis that may occur in cemented total hip arthroplasty. This study found no difference in the prevalence of acetabular osteolysis between the two groups.
Medical subject headings
- Acetabulum
- Bone Cements
- Hip Prosthesis
- Osteoarthritis, Hip
- Osteolysis
- Postoperative Complications
Anatomy
- hip