OKT3 prophylaxis in renal grafts with prolonged cold ischemia times: association with improvement in long-term survival.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 8648918.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The data on patients participating in two randomized, prospective studies with similar immunosuppressive regimens were updated and combined to evaluate the long-term effects of OKT3 according to cold ischemia time (< or = or > 24 hr). Among 159 patients in the OKT3 and 153 in the cyclosporine A (CsA) group, 8 and 12 deaths occurred, respectively (P = NS). In patients with cold ischemia > 24 hours, OKT3 prophylaxis resulted in a lower mean number of rejection episodes per patient than did CsA prophylaxis within one year (mean +/- SEM: 0.87 +/- 0.11 vs. 1.35 +/- 0.14, respectively; P = 0.008) and within five years (1.07 +/- 0.12 vs. 1.49 +/- 0.15, respectively; P = 0.032). In contrast, rejection incidences in patients with cold ischemia < or = 24 hours was not significantly different in the two groups. In all study patients, there was a trend towards higher graft survival rates in the OKT3 group versus the CsA group (at 5 years, 73% vs. 66%, respectively; P = 0.182). Among recipients of kidneys with cold ischemia times > 24 hours, OKT3 patients had significantly higher graft survival than CsA patients at two years (84% vs. 64%, respectively) and at five years (71% vs. 56%, respectively; P = 0.045). Significant differences were not observed in recipients of kidneys with cold ischemia times < or = 24 hours. In conclusion, patients receiving renal grafts with long cold ischemia times strongly benefit from OKT3 prophylaxis.
Medical subject headings
- Graft Rejection
- Immunosuppressive Agents
- Kidney Transplantation
- Muromonab-CD3
- Organ Preservation