Islet cell antibodies at diagnosis, but not leanness, relate to a better cardiovascular risk factor profile 5 years after diagnosis of NIDDM.
case_control · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 8720536.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To evaluate the relationship between islet cell antibodies (ICAs) and the cardiovascular risk profile 5 years after clinical diagnosis of NIDDM. Five years after clinical diagnosis, we evaluated blood pressure (BP) and lipids in 17 NIDDM patients with ICA at diagnosis (age 60 +/- 4 years) and 133 NIDDM patients without ICA at diagnosis (age 61 +/- 1 year). Urinary albumin excretion was evaluated in a subset of 12 NIDDM patients with ICA at diagnosis (age 60 +/- 4 years) and 82 NIDDM patients without ICA at diagnosis (age 61 +/- 1 year). NIDDM patients without ICA showed higher BP (140/86 +/- 2/1 mmHg vs. 128/79 +/- 3/2 mmHg; P < 0.05), total cholesterol (6.10 +/- 0.11 vs. 5.09 +/- 0.29 mmol/l; P < 0.01), LDL-to-HDL ratio (3.85 +/- 0.14 vs. 2.49 +/- 0.18; P < 0.001), and triglycerides (2.58 +/- 0.24 vs. 0.90 +/- 0.06 mmol/l; P < 0.001), lower HDL cholesterol (1.08 +/- 0.03 vs. 1.40 +/- 0.08 mmol/l; P < 0.001), and higher urinary albumin excretion (0.16 +/- 0.06 vs. 0.01 +/- 0.01 g/24 h; P < 0.05) than NIDDM patients with ICA. Among NIDDM patients without ICA, no differences concerning BP or lipids were found between obese and nonobese patients. ICA at diagnosis of NIDDM is a marker of more favorable cardiovascular risk profile 5 years after clinical diagnosis.
Medical subject headings
- Autoantibodies
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Diabetic Angiopathies