Comparison of failure strength between metallic and absorbable interference screws. Influence of insertion torque, tunnel-bone block gap, bone mineral density, and interference.
biomechanical · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 8734884.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Because of the good initial fixation strength of interference screws used in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, metal interference screws have become the standard method for fixation of bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts. To avoid some of the complications with metal screws, a bioabsorbable interference screw was developed. Data on fixation strength in older human cadavers indicate a similar failure strength between bioabsorbable and metal screws. We studied the failure mechanisms, insertion torques, and fixation strengths of absorbable and metal interference screws in cadaveric knees from young and middle-aged donors. With identical gap and screw size, the mean insertion torque for the metal screws (mean, 1.5 N-m; SD, 0.8) was significantly higher than for the absorbable screws (mean, 0.3 N-m; SD, 0.19). The mean failure load for the metal screws (mean 640 N; SD, 201) was also significantly higher than for the absorbable screws (mean, 418 N; SD, 118).
Medical subject headings
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament
- Biocompatible Materials
- Bone Density
- Bone Screws
- Femur
- Metals
Anatomy
- femur
- tibia
- knee