Emergency transtracheal ventilation: assessment of breathing systems chosen by anaesthetists.
other · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 8795321.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The choice of equipment for emergency transtracheal ventilation and the time taken to assemble it were surveyed in 39 anaesthetists. Thirty seven (95%) assembled a system in a median time of 104 s (interquartile range 54 s to 120 s). Systems specially constructed from oxygen tubing and connectors took longest to put together (p < 0.05). Consultants and senior registrars performed no better than senior house officers and registrars (p > 0.05). In the second part of the study we tested four anaesthetic systems which the survey revealed might be chosen for emergency transtracheal ventilation. These were: a simple length of oxygen tubing; a T-piece system; a Bain system; a jet injector. All had the appropriate connectors. The oxygen flow was measured through a 14 G venous "transtracheal' cannula on depression of the oxygen flush device on a standard Boyle's M anaesthetic machine. The jet injector was connected to the high pressure outlet. This device delivered the highest flow, 43 l.min-1 and was the only system capable of ventilating a trachea/lung model. The T-piece system, and the one constructed from oxygen tubing, delivered flows of 12.7 and 12.0 l.min-1, respectively, whereas the Bain system delivered only 4.7 l.min-1. We conclude that, except for jet ventilation, none of the systems chosen, using equipment available in the anaesthetic room, would be likely to achieve effective CO2 elimination; at best they would provide oxygenation.
Medical subject headings
- Emergency Service, Hospital
- Respiration, Artificial