Aspiration as a guide to sepsis in revision total hip arthroplasty.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 8872573.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
One hundred sixty-five patients underwent 171 preoperative aspiration arthrograms to evaluate a painful total hip arthroplasty. Intraoperative cultures and histologic specimens were obtained in all cases. Of the 166 aspirations where fluid was obtained, there were 140 true negative, 5 true positive, 18 false positive, and 3 false negative cultures. Sensitivity of hip aspiration to identify periprosthetic sepsis correctly was 50%; specificity was 88%. Hip aspiration with a 50% sensitivity rate lacks the ability to consistently predict those patients with occult periprosthetic sepsis. The routine use of aspiration in evaluation of a painful total hip is probably not indicated. Selective use in patients with a history of wound healing problems, radiographic changes, and elevated laboratory values should be considered.
Medical subject headings
- Arthrography
- False Positive Reactions
- Hip Prosthesis
- Hip Prosthesis/adverse effects
- Humans
- Pain
- Pain/etiology
- Prosthesis-Related Infections
- Prosthesis-Related Infections/diagnosis
- Prosthesis-Related Infections/microbiology
- Sensitivity and Specificity
- Sepsis
- Sepsis/diagnosis
- Staphylococcus epidermidis
- Staphylococcus epidermidis/isolation & purification
- Suction
Anatomy
- hip