Perceptions and opinions on the performance of Pap smears: a survey of clinicians using a commercial laboratory.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 8874691.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Office-based clinicians play a major role in cervical cancer screening in the United States, but little is known about their specific knowledge and understanding of the technical aspects of obtaining an adequate Pap smear. We surveyed 186 office-based clinicians using a major commercial laboratory for cytology services to obtain their opinions regarding the technical adequacy of Pap smears, collection procedures, and methods of communicating test results to patients. There was an 80.1% response rate. Two thirds of the respondents were men. Cytobrush use was reported significantly more by female clinicians. Respondents varied in reported rotation of the cytobrush, from 90 degrees to greater than 360 degrees. More female than male clinicians appropriately indicated that inflammation and heavy vaginal discharge caused sampling difficulties. Approximately half of the respondents believed that errors in cervical screening most often resulted from sampling the cervix or preparation of the Pap smear. Nineteen percent reported that ectocervical cells were not necessary for an adequate smear to be reported. Just over 25% of respondents indicated they did not report normal Pap smear results to the patient. The results indicate differences between clinicians by gender and specialty in reported knowledge, understanding, and technique in cervical cancer screening. The differences suggest that targeted education in this population may be important to improve the quality of cervical cancer screening. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH): screening; neoplasms, cervical; Papanicolaou smear; diagnosis, laboratory.