Problems related to the definition of "distal" bypass and "secondary" patency rates. A paper for debate.

Abstract

The large variations observed in "distal" bypass patency rates and the abuse of life-table analysis have encouraged most Vascular Committees to develop standards for evaluating results. However, problems continue to persist. Some of these do not relate to statistical analysis but to the lack of definition of both secondary patency and "distal" when referring to arterial bypass grafts to the lower limb. We present various problems and propose some strict definitions for each type of infrainguinal reconstruction, based on the inflow and outflow levels, together with a modification of the definitions of primary assisted and secondary patency.