Inclusion body myositis: no evidence for a neurogenic component.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 9008489.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Because electrophysiologic, clinical, and histopathologic observations have suggested that inclusion body myositis (IBM) may have a coexistent neurogenic component, we used macro-electromyography (macro-EMG) to search for changes in the motor unit territory and signs of reinnervation. We studied 11 patients, aged 53 to 77 years (mean, 65.2 years), with typical, nonfamilial IBM lasting a mean of 8.5 years, and eight healthy volunteers aged 54 to 70 years (mean, 64.6 years), as control subjects. Nerve conduction studies showed focal abnormalities in 5 of the patients, but no evidence of a polyneuropathy. Concentric needle EMG in various proximal and distal muscles of the upper and lower limbs revealed short- or long-duration complex motor unit potentials (MUPs) or a mixture of both types of MUPs. Macro-EMG studies in the tibialis anterior muscle showed smaller macro-MUP amplitudes and areas in patients than in normal subjects. Four patients had abnormal macro-EMG studies with an increased number of small macro-MUPs, 1 patient had an equivocal study with large-amplitude but normal-area macro-MUPs, and the remaining 6 patients had normal studies. These findings are consistent with a primary muscle disorder similar to those seen in other myopathies. We conclude that macro-EMG does not support a coexistent neurogenic component in patients with IBM compared with normal subjects of similar age.
Medical subject headings
- Myositis, Inclusion Body