Transurethral ureteroscopy: is local anesthesia with intravenous sedation sufficiently effective and safe?
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 9032532.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of local anesthesia and sedation in ureteroscopic interventions and to compare the results with other kinds of anesthesia. 107 ureteroscopic interventions have been done to 99 renoureteral units involving 77 patients under different kinds of anesthesia. 45 of 107 procedures were performed under general anesthesia, 11 under spinal/epidural anesthesia, and 51 using local anesthesia and intravenous sedation. The overall success rate was 90%. The failure rate was 18% for the procedures undertaken using local anesthesia. Local anesthesia in ureteroscopic interventions may be considered as a first choice because of almost similar success rates to other kinds of anesthesia: is has a low morbidity and low cost.
Medical subject headings
- Anesthesia, Local
- Diazepam
- Hypnotics and Sedatives
- Ureteroscopy