Baseline characteristics, natural history, and risk factors to progression in eyes with stage 2 macular holes. Results from a prospective randomized clinical trial. Vitrectomy for Macular Hole Study Group.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 9098283.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is (1) to determine baseline characteristics and natural history of immature full-thickness macular holes, (2) to describe progression and resolution, and (3) to present new aspects of pathogenesis of idiopathic macular hole. The authors analyzed 41 eyes with stage 2 macular holes (37 patients) in a multicentered prospective randomized trial; 19 eyes were randomized to observation (versus surgery) and had more than 12 months of follow-up, allowing determination of the natural course. Baseline and subsequent examinations included best-refracted visual acuity (Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study, potential acuity meter, Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity, and Bailey-Lovie reading vision), of clinical examinations, photography, and fluorescein angiography. Mean Snellen visual acuity was 20/66 at baseline. Centric holes usually had a small break (201 microns average mean diameter) with a dark yellow ring and without significant retinal elevation. Eccentric holes had a high maximum/minimum diameter ratio (mean, 1.88 +/- 0.7) and an incomplete cuff of subretinal fluid or yellow ring. Posterior vitreous detachment prevalence was 32% (8/25) in the centric hole group and 0% (0/ 16) in the eccentric hole group (P < 0.05). For the 19 eyes with 12 months of followup, progression rate to stage 3 (or 4) was 74% (n = 14). The diameter of the stage 2 holes increased significantly between baseline and 12 months (P < 0.001). Progression rate to stage 3 was 100% (8/8) in the eyes with pericentral hyperfluorescence (PCH) and 55% (6/11) in eyes without PCH (P < 0.05). Enlargement occurred in 100% of eccentric holes and 60% of centric holes (P = 0.09). Different progression patterns in eccentric and centric holes suggest different mechanisms of pathogenesis. Eccentric and centric stage 2 macular holes may have a different pathogenesis. Most stage 2 macular holes, especially with PCH (P < 0.05) or eccentric holes, progressed to stage 3 or 4. In addition to purely tangential traction, some component of obliquely oriented anteroposterior vitreous traction component may be important for pathogenesis of senile macular holes, particularly eccentric stage 2 macular holes.
Medical subject headings
- Retinal Perforations