Comparison of critical speed determined from track running and treadmill tests in elite runners.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 9148093.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare critical speed determined from a field test of maximal effort runs between 3 and 15 min on a running track and a laboratory test of high-speed runs on a treadmill with a 10-km criterion performance. Nine highly trained male runners (VO ++(2max) 67.7 +/- 4.1 ml*kg*min(-1)) participated in the study. Critical speed was determined from three maximal runs (907, 2267.5, and 4081.5 m) on a 453.5-m indoor running track and from three high speed runs on a treadmill. The treadmill speeds were individualized so that exhaustion was reached in approximately 3, 7, and 13 min. All subjects participated in a 10-km cross-country race (measured distance 9.8 km) on a flat and dry course. Track critical speed (293 m*min(-1)) was correlated (r = 0.92, P < 0.001) with race speed (293 m*min(-1)), whereas treadmill critical speed (300 m*min(-1)) had the same correlation but over predicted race performance. It was concluded that although both tests were correlated with 9.8-km race performance, track-determined critical speed was easy to administer with highly trained runners and was very similar to 10-km race speed.
Medical subject headings
- Exercise Test
- Running