Stereotactic localization with magnetic resonance imaging: a phantom study to compare the accuracy obtained using two-dimensional and three-dimensional data acquisitions.
other
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 9218305.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To compare the accuracy of stereotactic localization using magnetic resonance imaging (Siemens 1.5-T Magnetom; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) with two-dimensional and three-dimensional data acquisition techniques. A phantom study was performed in which the coordinates of an array of rods were determined from images in both two-dimensional and three-dimensional studies and compared with measured values in a series of transverse, coronal, and sagittal images. The results demonstrated a distinct advantage in using three-dimensional acquisition; an error greater than 2 mm was identified in only 0.8% of the imaged volume, compared with 12% of the imaged volume in the two-dimensional study. The results indicated that more accurate stereotactic localization is achieved with a three-dimensional acquisition.
Medical subject headings
- Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Phantoms, Imaging
- Stereotaxic Techniques