A dose-intensive, cyclophosphamide-based regimen for the treatment of recurrent/progressive or advanced solid tumors of childhood: a report from the Australia and New Zealand Children's Cancer Study Group.
case_series · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 9241083.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Children with solid tumors that progress or recur after conventional multimodality therapies have a very poor prognosis. In a pilot study, vincristine, etoposide, and dose-escalated cyclophosphamide (VETOPEC) was shown to be a promising salvage regimen. Continued accrual of patients and increased duration of follow-up has resulted in substantial experience with VETOPEC. Between May 1991 and March 1994, 56 pediatric patients from 6 centers were enrolled in this study; 44 had recurrent or progressive tumors (Group A) and 12 had newly diagnosed, advanced tumors with a very poor prognosis (Group B). The VETOPEC regimen was comprised of vincristine, 0.05 mg/kg, on Days 1 and 14; etoposide, 2.5 mg/kg, on Days 1, 2, and 3; and fractionated, dose-escalated cyclophosphamide on Days 1, 2, and 3. The initial cyclophosphamide dose was 90 mg/kg (2.7 g/m2)/cycle with an escalation of 15 mg/kg/cycle in each subsequent cycle, to a maximum (over 6 cycles) of 165 mg/kg (5.0 g/m2)/cycle. Tumor response was evaluated every two to three cycles and included central review of imaging. The combined and partial response rates for Groups A and B were 66% (25 of 38 patients) and 91% (10 of 11 patients), respectively. In Group A, best evaluable responses and event free (EF) survivors were observed with: brain tumors (7 of 9 patients; 2 EF at 39 and 45 months [mos], respectively), Wilms' tumor (6 of 7 patients; 3 EF at 37-49 mos), and lymphoma (4 of 4 patients; 2 EF at 52 and 59 mos, respectively); in Group B best evaluable responses and EF were observed with: neuroblastoma (5 of 6 patients; 1 disease free at 57 mos) and rhabdomyosarcoma (4 of 4 patients; no survivors). Hematologic toxicity was limiting despite support with myeloid growth factors in 33 patients. Four deaths in Group A and one in Group B were directly associated with this toxicity. Specifically, no cases of drug-related myocardial toxicity or pneumonitis were observed. This chemotherapy regimen with its intense scheduling produced a high response rate and appreciable survival in patients with a variety of recurrent, progressive, or advanced solid tumors of childhood.
Medical subject headings
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
- Neoplasms