Predictive accuracy of BIA equations for estimating fat-free mass of black men.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 9243498.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
This study assessed the predictive accuracy of previously published bioelectrical impedence analysis (BIA) equations in estimating the fat-free mass (FFM) of black men, 19 to 50 years. The reference method was hydrostatic weighing (HW) at residual lung volume. Body density (Db) was converted to relative body fat (%BF) for calculation of FFMHW using the Schutte et al. equation. Resistance and reactance were measured with a Valhalla bioimpedance analyzer. Age-specific, generalized, and fatness-specific BIA equations were cross validated using regression analysis. The Segal fatness-specific equations were modified using a method recommended by Stolarczyk. All of the equations significantly (P < 0.05) underestimated the average reference measure of FFMHW. However, the underestimation of FFM for the modified Segal fatness-specific equation was relatively small (-1.8 kg) and not likely to have much clinical significance. Furthermore, this equation had a high correlation with reference FFMHW (ry,y' = 0.97), low prediction errors (SEE = 2.1 kg; E = 2.7 kg), and accurately estimated the FFM within +/- 3.5 kg for 78% of the individuals in the sample. Thus, we recommend using the modified fatness-specific BIA equation for estimating the FFM of black men.
Medical subject headings
- Black People
- Body Composition
- Electric Impedance