Symptomatic outcome following clam ileocystoplasty.
case_series · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 9266228.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
This study was designed to assess the outcome of clam ileocystoplasty (CI) based on patients' subjective perception and objectively validated scoring systems. Quality-of-life parameters were also examined as aspects of outcome. Between 1989 and 1994, 27 patients (15 male and 12 female) underwent CI. The median age was 41 years (13-75 years). CI was performed after failed pharmacological treatment. The mean length of follow-up for this patient cohort was 18 months (range: 1-4 years). Overall cure rate was objectively assessed at 61%. Seventy-two percent of patients described a subjective improvement of symptoms, and a small number of patients (12.5%) were subjectively worse following the operation. Quality of life was improved in 75% of patients, with 12.5% showing no improvement and 12.5% being worse. Fifty-six percent of patients noted a minor degree of voiding dysfunction, whereas 25% noted moderate and 19% noted severe voiding dysfunction. CI offered improvement with satisfaction in the group of patients studied, however not all patients achieved a satisfactory outcome. The patients who were worse following the procedure were all young females with detrusor instability. Careful patient selection and pre-operative counselling may reduce the failure rate. Outcome analysis based on standardised questionnaires allows patients and surgeons to make informed decisions with realistic expectations.
Medical subject headings
- Ileum
- Postoperative Complications
- Quality of Life
- Urinary Bladder
- Urination Disorders