Effect of phlebotomy technique on serum bicarbonate values.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 9444341.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To determine whether the following phlebotomy technique factors result in spuriously low serum bicarbonate values: 1) small needle size, 2) prolonged tourniquet time, and 3) underfilling of Vacutainer tubes. Thirty-eight healthy young adult student volunteers from Brown University (mean age = 22 years) were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 (24-ga or 20-ga) IV needle size groups. With a tourniquet applied, the subjects had blood sampled initially and then at 3 intervals 1 minute apart. In addition, the initial blood sample was separated into four 4-mL Vacutainer tubes in blood volumes of 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 mL. Serum bicarbonate values (mmol/L) were compared using these techniques. 1) Small needle size did not affect serum bicarbonate values (p > 0.60); 2) prolonged tourniquet time resulted in a statistically significant serum bicarbonate elevation (32.0, 32.5, 33.8, and 33.6, respectively; p < 0.01); and 3) underfilling of Vacutainer tubes resulted in significantly lower serum bicarbonate values for all 4 Vacutainer blood volume groups (21.4, 23.0, 25.0, and 26.2, respectively; p < 0.001). Small needle size does not affect serum bicarbonate values. Prolonged tourniquet time results in a statistically significant elevation of serum bicarbonate, although this elevation may not be clinically meaningful. Underfilling of Vacutainer tubes significantly influences the accuracy of serum bicarbonate values.
Medical subject headings
- Bicarbonates
- Phlebotomy