Six-month angiographic outcome after successful repeat percutaneous intervention for in-stent restenosis.

Bauters, C; Banos, J L; Van Belle, E; Mc Fadden, E P; Lablanche, J M; Bertrand, M E · Circulation · 1998

prospective_cohort · Level II

Where this comes from

Abstract

In-stent restenosis is an increasing clinical problem. Discordant results have been published regarding the risk of recurrent restenosis after repeat angioplasty for the treatment of in-stent restenosis. One hundred three consecutive patients (107 vessels) underwent repeat percutaneous intervention for the treatment of in-stent restenosis and were entered in a prospective angiographic follow-up program. Repeat balloon angioplasty was performed at 93 lesions (87%) and additional stenting at 14 lesions (13%). The primary success rate was 98%. Six-month angiographic follow-up was performed in 85% of eligible patients. Restenosis was determined by quantitative angiography. Restenosis defined as a >50% diameter stenosis at follow-up was observed at 22% of lesions. The rate of target-lesion revascularization at 6 months was 17%. Repeat intervention for diffuse in-stent restenosis and severe stenosis before repeat intervention were associated with significantly higher rates of recurrent restenosis. The overall restenosis rate after repeat intervention for in-stent restenosis is low. The subgroup of patients with diffuse and/or severe in-stent restenosis, however, is at higher risk of recurrent restenosis and may benefit from alternative therapeutic strategies.

Medical subject headings