Pretransplant test-dose pharmacokinetic profiles: cyclosporine microemulsion versus corn oil-based soft gel capsule formulation.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 9527407.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of pretransplant test-dose pharmacokinetic (PK) profiling after administration of the microemulsion (CsA-ME; Neoral) versus the corn oil-based (CsA-GC; Sandimmune) gel capsule formulations of cyclosporin A (CsA) to estimate posttransplant CsA bioavailability and to individualize starting drug doses. The absolute oral bioavailability (F), clearance rate (CL), average blood concentration (C[av]), peak concentration (Cmax), and time to Cmax (tmax) values were calculated from paired intravenous and oral pretransplant PK profiles of renal transplant candidates, using CsA-GC (n = 70) or CsA-ME (n = 70) administration. The initial posttransplant oral CsA dose was estimated by linear extrapolation of the observed pretransplant value to the target concentration. Because higher mean F (P < 0.0001), but not CL, values were observed in end-stage renal disease patients after CsA-ME compared with CsA-GC treatment, the predicted starting doses for each therapy were markedly different (P < 0.01). From posttransplant days 5 to 7, 54% of patients treated with CsA-ME had a mean dose-normalized C(av) (C(av)/dose, D) value within 20% of the target concentration, compared with 42% of patients treated with CsA-GC (P = 0.03). Administration of the predicted oral dose of CsA-ME produced a Cmax > 700 ng/ml in 90% of patients from days 2 to 4, and in 97% from days 5 to 7, whereas administration of the predicted oral dose of CsA-GC produced a Cmax > 700 ng/ml in only 64 and 82% of patients during these same time periods, respectively (both P < 0.05). The mean estimated posttransplant F value of CsA-ME was significantly higher than that of CsA-GC; even at postoperative day 5 the value for CsA-GC was significantly lower than the pretransplant estimate (P < 0.01). Therefore, CsA-ME pretransplant PK profiles yield more accurate predictions for appropriate starting drug doses than those of CsA-GC.
Medical subject headings
- Cyclosporine
- Kidney Transplantation