A change in resistance? A survey of epidural practice amongst obstetric anaesthetists.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 9613268.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Five hundred members of the Obstetric Anaesthetists Association were surveyed regarding their technique for identification of the epidural space. Eighty-one per cent of the questionnaires were returned completed. Fifty-nine per cent of respondents first learned a loss of resistance to air technique, 33.4% to saline and 7.4% another technique. Presently, 37.1% and 52.7% use only a loss of resistance to air or saline, respectively. Six per cent use both techniques and 3.2% use other techniques. Twenty-eight per cent taught a loss of resistance to air, 57.2% taught a loss of resistance to saline and 12.9% taught both techniques. Twenty-three per cent changed from a loss of resistance to air, to a saline technique, and 4.2% vice versa. Forty-seven per cent of those using air felt that loss of resistance to air was not associated with a clinically significant difference in the incidence of accidental dural puncture compared with saline.
Medical subject headings
- Anesthesia, Epidural
- Anesthesia, Obstetrical
- Practice Patterns, Physicians'