Experimental study of the histocompatibility of covered expandable metallic stents in the trachea.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the histocompatibility of four different materials used to cover expandable metallic stents. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, unblinded study. SETTING: Animal research laboratory of Kurume University. PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS: Twenty 12- to 18-kg mongrel dogs. INTERVENTIONS: Handmade Gianturco-type stents with six bends, 20 mm in length, and 15 to 20 mm in diameter were covered using four different materials: polypropylene mesh, silicone-coated mesh, polyester mesh, and ePTFE. Covered stents were inserted into the trachea after i.v. anesthesia. Five animals were used in each group. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Postinsertion status was observed using clinical and bronchoscopy measures 7, 14, 28, and 56 days after intervention. Eight weeks after stent insertion, the tracheal specimens were studied pathologically. A scoring system was used to evaluate the histocompatibility of covered stents in each study group. The mean of clinical scores in the polypropylene group was 1.84+/-0.36, which was significantly higher than those in the groups of silicone, polyester, and ePTFE. The means of histopathologic scores in the polypropylene group and the silicone group were 1.60+/-0.55, which were significantly higher than those in groups of polyester and ePTFE. CONCLUSIONS: Polypropylene mesh cover was more suitable than silicone-coated mesh, polyester mesh, and ePTFE because of its excellent histocompatibility.