Preliminary results of bedside inferior vena cava filter placement: safe and cost-effective.
case_series · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 9674486.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The use of inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) is increasing in patients at high risk for venous thromboembolism; however, there is considerable controversy related to their cost. We inserted eight percutaneous IVCFs at the bedside. The hospital charges for bedside IVCF insertion were substantially lower compared with those for IVCF insertion performed in the Radiology Department or operating room. There was one death (unrelated to the procedure) and one asymptomatic caval occlusion believed to be caused by thrombus trapping. Bedside IVCF insertion is safe and cost-effective in selected patients. This practice averts the potential complications associated with transporting critically ill patients.
Medical subject headings
- Patients' Rooms
- Vena Cava Filters