10 year experience of splenic injury: an increasing place for conservative management after blunt trauma.

Abstract

It has been suggested that over 30 per cent of splenic injuries are suitable for conservative management by non-operative treatment and splenorrhaphy; splenic conservation avoids the risk of overwhelming post-splenectomy infection. In this study, injuries of the spleen have been retrospectively analysed for a 10 year period. In the first 5 years the spleen was conserved in only 6/45 (15 per cent) of patients with blunt injury (three non-operative, three splenorrhaphy). In the second 5 years of the study, the spleen was conserved in significantly more patients with blunt trauma, 25 of 61 (41 per cent). This change has been a result of increased non-operative management which has been successful in the majority of cases (20/22). This has been associated with the increased use of abdominal ultrasound. The rate of splenorrhaphy has not changed significantly, five patients compared with three in the previous 5 years. Non-operative management may be increasingly appropriate as less severe splenic injuries are being detected with an increased use of ultrasound. Splenic injury is not a mandatory indication for laparotomy; non-operative management of splenic injuries should be considered in selected patients who are haemodynamically stable and can be closely monitored.