Inherent stability of proximal first metatarsal osteotomies: a comparative analysis.

Abstract

Proximal first metatarsal osteotomies have been criticized for their instability leading to the dorsal displacement of the first metatarsal head. The purpose of this study was to compare inherent stability of fixated proximal oblique wedge and crescentic first metatarsal osteotomies against simulated vertical ground reactive forces. The authors evaluated four groups of 10 models each with various proximal osteotomy and fixation configurations. Group I was a control group of bone models without osteotomies; group II had oblique closing wedge osteotomies with one 2.7-mm, fully threaded, cortical screw fixation; group III had oblique closing wedge osteotomies with two 2.7-mm, fully threaded, cortical screw fixation; and group IV had proximal crescentic osteotomies with one 4.0-mm, partially threaded, cancellous screw fixation. All 40 bone models were stressed with simulated vertical ground reactive forces. Maximum load to achieve catastrophic failure was higher in the crescentic group (67.7 N, SD 15.1 N, p < or = .005), but the energy required to displace the osteotomy during the stressing sequence was higher in the two-screw oblique closing wedge osteotomy (390.6 N.mm, SD 153.4 N.mm, p < or = .01). The single-screw oblique closing wedge osteotomies showed the least ability to resist simulated vertical ground reactive forces (39.6 N, SD 19.1 N, p < or = .005).