Long-term within-subject variability of inspiratory neural drive response to hypoxia.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 9726740.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: We analyze the within-subject variation of mouth occlusion pressure (P0.1) response to progressive isocapnic hypoxic stimulation over long time periods in normal subjects. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: We studied 21 healthy subjects (14 male and 7 female; aged 40+/-12 yrs) (mean+/-SD). Lung volumes, basal P0.1, and P0.1 response to hypoxia were measured on two separate occasions 2 months apart, under similar ambient and clinical conditions. RESULTS: There was no significant change in clinical condition, FVC, FEV1, arterial oxygenation saturation, end-tidal and mixed venous PCO2 levels, or P0.1 between the two visits. The mean P0.1 responses to hypoxia in the two explorations were 0.032+/-0.022 and 0.034+/-0.022 kPa/%, respectively. There was a moderate intrasubject variability of P0.1 response to hypoxia, with a coefficient of reproducibility of 0.01 kPa/%. Power calculations to establish the optimal sample size required for hypoxic stimulation are presented. CONCLUSION: Long term within-subject variability of P0.1 response to hypoxia is moderate. This intrinsic variability needs to be emphasized when interpreting the effects of experimental interventions on hypoxic sensitivity.
Medical subject headings
- Hypoxia
- Motor Neurons
- Respiration
- Respiratory Center