A comparison of the relative costs of cast treatment and intramedullary nailing for tibial diaphyseal fractures in the UK.

Abstract

A retrospective study was undertaken to compare the costs of treating tibial diaphyseal fractures non-operatively in a cast or operatively with locked intramedullary nailing. In total 39 patients with isolated closed or grade I open, two-part, displaced tibial diaphyseal fractures were studied. Of these, 18 were treated by manipulation under anaesthesia and cast immobilization, and 21 by closed, reamed, locked intramedullary nailing. A detailed analysis of the cost of treatment of each patient was performed and analysed in terms of the in-hospital costs and the overall costs, taking into account time off work. The mean hospital costs were 2226 pounds for plaster treatment and 3727 pounds for intramedullary nailing (significantly different, p < 0.05). The mean time off work was 9 weeks longer in the plaster group and when the cost of lost production through time off work was added to the hospital costs, the overall costs of plaster treatment and intramedullary nailing were 6810 Pounds and 6592 Pounds (difference not significant). This study suggests that the cost to the hospital of treating these fractures is less with plaster treatment but that the overall cost to the community is no different.