Can academic radiology departments become more efficient and cost less?

Seltzer, S E; Saini, S; Bramson, R T; Kelly, P; Levine, L; Chiango, B F; Jordan, P; Seth, A et al. · Radiology · 1998

retrospective_cohort · Level III

Where this comes from

Abstract

To determine how successful two large academic radiology departments have been in responding to market-driven pressures to reduce costs and improve productivity by downsizing their technical and support staffs while maintaining or increasing volume. A longitudinal study was performed in which benchmarking techniques were used to assess the changes in cost and productivity of the two departments for 5 years (fiscal years 1992-1996). Cost per relative value unit and relative value units per full-time equivalent employee were tracked. Substantial cost reduction and productivity enhancement were realized as linear improvements in two key metrics, namely, cost per relative value unit (decline of 19.0% [decline of $7.60 on a base year cost of $40.00] to 28.8% [$12.18 of $42.21]; P < or = .001) and relative value unit per full-time equivalent employee (increase of 46.0% [increase of 759.55 units over a base year productivity of 1,651.45 units] to 55.8% [968.28 of 1,733.97 units]; P < .001), during the 5 years of study. Academic radiology departments have proved that they can "do more with less" over a sustained period.

Medical subject headings