Lifting of the upper two-thirds of the face: supraperiosteal-subSMAS versus subperiosteal approach. The quest for physiologic surgery.
case_series · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 9811020.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The supraperiosteal-subSMAS lifting technique, which has been performed since 1985, for the rejuvenation of the upper two-thirds of the face is described, and the results obtained in a series of 128 cases treated, emphasizing the attainment of an effective rejuvenation together with a minimum of complications and undesired effects is presented. A discussion on the two dissection planes (supraperiosteal-subSMAS versus subperiosteal) used most commonly in the lifting of the upper two-thirds of the face is presented. From an anatomohistophysiologic basis, the tissue manipulations that the two techniques mandate are discussed and evaluated. Based on these facts, the supraperiosteal-subSMAS technique is the most logical physiologically, because it produces less tissue trauma, which leads to fewer complications and a more rapid recovery to a normal social life.
Medical subject headings
- Rhytidoplasty