High-resolution magnetic resonance angiography of the internal carotid artery: 2D vs 3D TOF in stenotic disease.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 9853217.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare high-resolution 2D TOF with high-resolution 3D TOF in the study of internal carotid artery disease. Sixty-four patients with clinical signs of cerebrovascular insufficiency were studied with a superconductive 1.5 T magnet using two techniques: 2D and 3D TOF. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was the gold standard. The 2D TOF technique was performed using the following parameters: TR/TE/FA/MA 49 ms/9 ms/60 degrees/512 x 256; the 3D TOF was performed with the following parameters: TR/TE/FA/MA 50 ms/8 ms/20 degrees/512 x 256. The 2D TOF agreed with DSA in 116 of 128 diagnostic judgments (90%) and overestimated seven times. The 3D TOF technique agreed with DSA in 125 of 128 diagnostic judgments (97%) with one overestimation and two underestimations. There was no statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) between the two different techniques. Our study confirms the high reliability of the methodology carried out with the high-resolution 2D and 3D technique.
Medical subject headings
- Carotid Stenosis
- Image Enhancement
- Magnetic Resonance Angiography