Defecographic study of rectal evacuation in constipated patients and control subjects.
case_control · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 9885594.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To validate a computer-based area calculation method of quantification of rectal evacuation by using defecography videotapes and to use that method to compare evacuation in constipated patients with that in control subjects. For validation of the method, simultaneous defecography and weight measurements were compared in 36 patients with constipation or incontinence. Evacuation was calculated as the rate of change of the contrast medium-covered rectal area (percentage per second) or of the evacuated amount of contrast medium (percentage per second [relative] and grams per second [absolute]). After method validation, from a series of 215 consecutive constipated patients, individuals with an isolated radiologic diagnosis of intussusception greater than 0.6 cm (n = 27), rectocele greater than 2 cm (n = 19), enterocele (n = 12), or paradoxic puborectal muscle contraction (n = 12) were selected. Rectal evacuation in these groups was compared with that in 30 control subjects. Rectal evacuation rates measured at defecography correlated well with weighed amounts of evacuated contrast medium during the initial and total evacuation periods in 21 patients without contrast medium leak (r = 0.92, P < .001). Constipation overall, a rectocele greater than 2 cm, or paradoxic puborectal muscle contraction were associated with impaired evacuation (P < .001). Area calculations of rectal evacuation reflect rectal emptying. A rectocele greater than 2 cm or a paradoxic puborectal muscle contraction may be associated with obstructed defecation.
Medical subject headings
- Constipation
- Defecography
- Rectum